This suggests that the metaphor of the fetish exists and is still relevant. While we search as researchers for the big answer to the question of food in our worlds, there seems to be no real meta-narrative to be discovered. Rather, there is more and more peeling back to be done, more bringing into the light, and than more activism to move the discourse forward.
In something that is an aside and not relevant to the actual paper but attempts to discuss your questions about the style/approaches of the 'following' review, I think that it has to pointed out that Ian is known for this type of writing, At least from the style which may be somewhat 'stream of consciousness' (although I know from personal contact with Ian that it is hard work, well-researched and disciplined). Most of us would not get away with that style, it would be taken to task for not being empirical enough, not full of enough data, perhaps too close to Derrida in writing for writings sake and not scientific. Sort of like what the blog here is trying to create. But if things are not challenged, than what are we doing?
Guthman, Julie. 2008. "If They Only Knew": Color Blindness and Universalism in California Alternative Food Institutions. The Professional Geographer, 60(3): 387-397.
No comments:
Post a Comment